CZERNICH, C. and C. HEATH, 2001. … of Variation in Idea-Markets: Attracting ‘Eyeballs' to Websites during the Dot-Com Boom and Bust. [Cited by 5] (0.67/year)
DARLING, P., 2001. From Communism to Dot Com. Retrieved June. [Cited by 4] (0.54/year)
JACKSON, K., 2000. Dot-org to dot-com: The shift is on. InformationWeek. [Cited by 4] (0.48/year)
JACOBS, G. and W. DOWSLAND, 2000. The dot-com economy in Wales: the long road ahead. UK Academy of Information Systems Conference, Swansea. [Cited by 11] (1.31/year)
JEREMY, Q., 2003. Addicted to dot-com sex. Advocate (Los Angeles, Calif). [Cited by 4] (0.74/year)
KALATHIL, S., 2003. Dot Com for Dictators. Foreign Policy. [Cited by 11] (2.03/year)
KAPLAN, P.J., 2002. F'd Companies: Spectacular Dot-Com Flameouts. Simon and Schuster. [Cited by 15] (2.34/year)
NATARAJ, S. and J. LEE, 2002. Dot-Com Companies: Are They All Hype?. SAM ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. [Cited by 5] (0.78/year)
ODER, N., 2000. … OCLC's effort to organize web resources, but in light of the quantum dot. com leaps, are librarians …. LIBRARY JOURNAL-NEW YORK-. [Cited by 10] (1.19/year)
OFEK, E. and M. RICHARDSON, 2003. Dot-com mania: market inefficiency in the internet sector. Journal of Finance. [Cited by 10] (1.85/year)
ORR, B., 2001. Dot. com bank prospers in tough times. American Bankers Association's Banking Journal. [Cited by 4] (0.54/year)
PLAVE, L.J. and R.B. AMOLSCH, 2000. How to Implement Dot. Com Franchising Solutions: Two Aspects of A Multi-faceted Issue. FRANCHISING WORLD. [Cited by 5] (0.59/year)
REINGOLD, J., 1999. Dot. com boards are flouting the rules: They're small and packed with insiders. Does it matter. Business Week. [Cited by 13] (1.38/year)
SPENDER, D., 2000. The role of a university in a dot com society: what is it?. Lancaster University., plenary at the 2nd International …. [Cited by 5] (0.59/year)
STEIN, A. and A. CRAIG, 2000. The dot. com generation: IT practices and skills of transition students. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Computing …. [Cited by 5] (0.59/year)
SWANN, P., 2000. TV Dot com: The Future of Interactive Television. TV Books Inc. [Cited by 19] (2.26/year)
TELBERG, R., 2000. Dot-com or dot-org? Melancon & Co. envision AICPA Inc. Accounting Today. [Cited by 4] (0.48/year)
TIWANA, A. and M. WILLIAMS, 2000. The Essential Guide to Knowledge Management:: E-Business and Crm Applications. Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. [Cited by 120] (14.25/year)
UNNITHAN, C.R. and P.M.C. SWATMAN, 2001. EBANKING ADAPTATION AND DOT. COM VIABILITY-A COMPARISON OF AUSTRALIAN AND INDIAN EXPERIENCES IN THE …. Proceedings of the 11 thBusiness Information Technology …. [Cited by 5] (0.67/year)
USEEM, J., 2000. Dot-coms: What have we learned. Fortune. [Cited by 24] (2.85/year)
VENKATRAMAN, N., 2000. ``Five steps to a dot. com strategy''. Sloan Management Review. [Cited by 9] (1.07/year)
VITALE, M., 2001. The Dot. com Legacy: Governing IT on Internet Time. presentation at the Information Systems Research Center, …. [Cited by 5] (0.67/year)
WEIL, J., 2001. ‘Going Concerns': Did Accountants Fail to Flag Problems at Dot-Com Casualties?. Wall Street Journal. [Cited by 10] (1.35/year)
WIND, J. and V. MAHAJAN, 2001. Convergence Marketing: Strategies for Reaching the New Hybrid Consumer. Financial Times/Prentice Hall. [Cited by 63] (8.49/year)
WOOLRIDGE, M. and M.J. WOOLDRIDGE, 2001. Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA. [Cited by 1872] (252.31/year)